Back to the database
Record STMT-M122Voluntary

Anthropic’s Responsible Scaling Policy

Institutional policy Corporate governancein force

Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy outlines risk governance frameworks and safety standards for frontier artificial intelligence models. It establishes capability thresholds, risk reporting protocols, and concrete deployment and security safeguards to mitigate catastrophic risks such as misuse or autonomous replication. The policy operates as a living document that undergoes iterative revisions to address emerging safety challenges.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

AnthropicIndustry
Lead issuer
Legal forceVoluntary
Under whose authorityCorporate governance
Judged fromabstract

Who it governs

AI developers and providersCompaniesResearchers and academics

AI developers, researchers, and safety professionals interested in corporate risk governance and technical safety standards for frontier AI models.

Sectors
Telecommunications and digital services · artificial intelligence developmentResearch and science

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers internal corporate governance policies, risk thresholds, deployment safeguards (such as prompt and completion filtering and access controls), and security controls (such as endpoint patching, access management, and vulnerability scanning) intended to govern the development and release of advanced AI systems.

What's missing

The text lacks legislative enforcement mechanisms, government-mandated oversight details, or legally binding external regulatory penalties, as it represents a self-governance policy issued directly by a private company.

Key takeaways
  • Anthropic maintains an iterative Responsible Scaling Policy designed to mitigate catastrophic risks associated with frontier AI models.
  • The policy defines capability thresholds—such as automated R&D and CBRN weapons production—that trigger mandatory upgrades in safety and security safeguards.
  • Deployment safeguards incorporate a multi-layered defense-in-depth architecture including real-time classifiers, asynchronous monitoring, and rapid post-hoc jailbreak detection.
  • Security safeguards enforce strict access management, compartmentalization, hardware procurement controls, and multi-party authorization for model weights.
  • Anthropic publishes periodic Risk Reports and updates its Frontier Safety Roadmaps to maintain transparency regarding safety evaluations and preparedness.
Outline
· Overview and Current and Prior Versions
· Risk Reports
· Frontier Safety Roadmap Updates
· Noncompliance Reporting and Anti-Retaliation Policy
· Planned ASL-3 Safeguards (Deployment Safeguards & Security Safeguards)
IssuedNot recorded
Length2,911 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

3/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Establish an Executive Risk Council sponsored by executive leadership to oversee security programs.

Security Safeguards - Executive Risk Council

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

4/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

For edge cases or situations requiring human judgment, there will be protocols for escalation to human reviewers.

Post-hoc jailbreak detection

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

4/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Our RSP contains requirements for meeting these standards, and also says we will publicly release key information related to the evaluation and deployment of our models

October 15, 2024 - Planned ASL-3 Safeguards

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

4/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

In our Responsible Scaling Policy, reaching certain Capability Thresholds requires us to upgrade our safeguards to the ASL-3 Security Standard or the ASL-3 Deployment Standard.

October 15, 2024 - Planned ASL-3 Safeguards

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

4/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Our Risk Reports aim to provide a direct, candid, and informative description of how we see the risks of our systems and our state of preparedness for them

August 14, 2026

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

artificial_intelligence frontier_ai risk_management safety_standards security_safeguards