Back to the database
Record STMT-M229Legally binding

Automated Employment Decision Tools (AEDT)

Legislation State lawNorthern America · USin force

Local Law 144 of 2021 prohibits employers and employment agencies in New York City from using automated employment decision tools unless the tool has undergone a bias audit within one year of use, audit information is publicly available, and mandatory notices are provided to candidates or employees. The law is enforced by the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

New York City Department of Consumer and Worker ProtectionRegulator · US
Lead issuer
Legal forceLegally binding
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

CompaniesGeneral publicRegulatorsWorkers

Employers, employment agencies, workers, and job candidates in New York City who need to understand compliance and rights regarding automated hiring tools.

Sectors
Labour and employment · employment and recruitment

What the document contains

What's covered

The web page and associated law cover the regulations, bias audit requirements, public disclosure rules, candidate notices, enforcement dates, and complaint procedures regarding automated employment decision tools in New York City.

What's missing

The exact technical methodologies for conducting bias audits and comprehensive definitions of all covered AI models are not detailed on this landing page.

Key takeaways
  • Employers and employment agencies cannot use automated employment decision tools unless the tool has been subjected to a bias audit within one year of use.
  • Information about the bias audit must be made publicly available.
  • Certain notices must be provided to employees or job candidates prior to the use of an AEDT.
  • Individuals can file a complaint online with DCWP if an employer fails to conduct a bias audit, post a summary, or give required notices.
Outline
· Automated Employment Decision Tools (AEDT)
· FAQ
· File a Complaint
· Educational Roundtables
Issued2021
Length358 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopesubnational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

4/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

unless the tool has been subject to a bias audit within one year of the use of the tool

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

4/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

information about the bias audit is publicly available, and certain notices have been provided to employees or job candidates

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

4/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Note: DCWP will begin enforcement of this law and rule on July 5, 2023.

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

4/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

prohibits employers and employment agencies from using an automated employment decision tool unless the tool has been subject to a bias audit

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

automated_employment_decision_tools bias_audit employment algorithm_regulation workplace_fairness