CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W0BEF2BSoft law

Regulação da inteligência artificial: experiências internacionais e desafios para o Brasil

Report International lawLatin America and the Caribbean · BRin force

This document examines international approaches to artificial intelligence regulation and discusses the challenges and implications for Brazil. It provides an overview of legislative and policy developments in various jurisdictions to inform domestic discussions on AI governance. The study analyzes comparative models to help guide policymakers and researchers interested in shaping Brazil's regulatory framework.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Câmara dos DeputadosLegislature · BR
Lead issuer
Legal forceSoft law
Under whose authorityInternational law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentLegislatorsRegulatorsResearchers and academics

Legislators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to understand international AI governance and its application to Brazil.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers international regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence and analyzes how these foreign experiences apply to the Brazilian context, discussing policy challenges and legislative options.

What's missing

It does not establish binding rules, enforcement mechanisms, or technical standards, as it functions as an institutional study and report rather than a statute.

Key takeaways
  • International regulatory models for artificial intelligence vary across different global jurisdictions.
  • Brazil faces unique institutional and legislative challenges in designing its national AI framework.
  • Comparative analysis of foreign approaches can inform effective domestic policymaking.
  • Balancing innovation and fundamental rights is a central theme in AI regulation.
Outline
· Apresentação
· Introdução
· Experiências Internacionais
· Desafios para o Brasil
· Conclusão
IssuedApril 2023
Length1,530 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

artificial_intelligence regulation international_law comparative_law public_policy
Regulação da inteligência artificial: experiências internacionais e desafios para o Brasil · CEI AI Governance Database