Back to the database
Record STMT-W22471ESoft law

Artificial intelligence transparency

Statement State lawOceania · AUin force

This artificial intelligence transparency statement outlines how the Australian Trade and Investment Commission (Austrade) responsibly implements artificial intelligence in alignment with Australian government policy and the Digital Transformation Agency's standards. It details Austrade's definition of AI, its internal use cases for workplace productivity and analytics, and the governance mechanisms, training requirements, and oversight structures in place. The statement ensures that AI is used under human supervision and complies with relevant legislation regarding privacy and ethics.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Australian Trade and Investment CommissionGovernment (executive) · AU
Lead issuer
Legal forceSoft law
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Public sector bodiesGeneral publicResearchers and academics

This document is for the public, clients, and staff to understand how Austrade governs and implements artificial intelligence.

Sectors
Public administration · trade and investment services

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers Austrade's definition of artificial intelligence, its adoption and use cases in workplace productivity and analytics, internal training requirements, security risk management, and agency governance mechanisms.

What's missing

The text does not include technical specifications of the algorithms used, procurement criteria for external vendors, or penalties for non-compliance by staff.

Key takeaways
  • Austrade implements artificial intelligence responsibly in alignment with Australian government policy.
  • Staff must complete mandatory AI Foundations training and confirm internal policies before accessing generative AI tools.
  • Austrade currently limits AI usage to workplace productivity and analytics for insights, ensuring human review for all outputs.
  • An Accountable Official oversees AI matters with review processes managed by an internal AI Working Group.
Principles it states
Be personally accountable for the use of AI outputs including the ability to explain and justify any advice or decisions based on those outputs.Review and verify all AI outputs in full including for potential biases and discrimination against any individual or group.Be transparent and disclose when AI is used in material for clients, partners or the public.
Outline
· Introduction
· How Austrade defines AI
· Austrade’s approach to AI adoption and use
· How Austrade uses AI
· Classification of AI system use cases
· Monitoring and Governance
· Updates to this Statement
Issued18 February 2025
Length967 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

3/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Be personally accountable for the use of AI outputs including the ability to explain and justify any advice or decisions based on those outputs.

How Austrade uses AI

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

3/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Review and verify all AI outputs in full including for potential biases and discrimination against any individual or group.

How Austrade uses AI

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

3/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

AI is only used under human supervision.

Monitoring and Governance

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

3/5

Protection of personal data and private life

AI use complies with all relevant legislation and regulation regarding Privacy and AI.

Monitoring and Governance

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

5/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Austrade is committed to transparency in Artificial Intelligence (AI). This statement outlines how we responsibly implement AI in line with government policy.

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

3/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

For each AI tool, a security risk management plan and system authorisation is required prior to deployment.

Monitoring and Governance

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

3/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

AI use cases are assessed for potential negative impacts.

Monitoring and Governance

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

artificial_intelligence public_administration transparency ai_governance australia