Back to the database
Record STMT-W28BC70Soft law

Principles for responsible, trustworthy and privacy-protective generative AI technologies

Principles State lawCAin force

This document outlines privacy principles and considerations for responsible, trustworthy, and privacy-protective generative AI technologies. Issued by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and provincial counterparts, it guides developers, providers, and organizations using generative AI on complying with Canadian privacy laws. It covers key areas including legal authority and consent, appropriate purposes, necessity and proportionality, openness, accountability, individual access, limiting collection, accuracy, and safeguards.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of CanadaRegulator · CA
Lead issuer
Legal forceSoft law
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

AI developers and providersRegulatorsCompaniesAI deployers and users

Organizations developing, providing, or using generative AI technologies in Canada to help them apply key privacy principles and comply with privacy laws.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses how Canadian privacy legislation and core privacy principles apply to the development, provision, and deployment of generative AI systems. It details specific responsibilities for AI developers, providers, and users regarding personal information, consent, transparency, accuracy, and risk mitigation.

What's missing

The document does not provide binding adjudications for specific investigations, nor does it establish comprehensive non-privacy regulations outside the scope of Canadian data protection frameworks.

Key takeaways
  • Generative AI technologies must comply with existing Canadian privacy laws and regulations.
  • Organizations must establish clear legal authority and obtain valid, meaningful consent when collecting personal information for AI training and use.
  • Developers and users must avoid prohibited 'no-go zones' such as malicious content generation or discriminatory profiling.
  • Accountability for decisions made or supported by AI rests with the deploying organization rather than the automated system.
  • Safeguards such as adversarial testing, transparency, and data minimization must be implemented throughout the AI lifecycle.
Principles it states
Legal Authority and ConsentAppropriate PurposesNecessity and proportionalityOpennessAccountabilityIndividual AccessLimiting Collection, Use, and DisclosureAccuracySafeguards
Outline
· About this document
· Intended Audience for this Document
· Special consideration: The unique impact on vulnerable groups
· Principles for the Development, Provision, and Use of Generative AI systems
  1. Legal Authority and Consent
  2. Appropriate Purposes
  3. Necessity and proportionality
  4. Openness
  5. Accountability
  6. Individual Access
  7. Limiting Collection, Use, and Disclosure
  8. Accuracy
  9. Safeguards
Issued7 December 2023
Length4,636 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

5/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Establish accountability for compliance with privacy legislation and principles and make AI tools explainable.

5. Accountability

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

4/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Developers, providers, and organizations using generative AI systems must all actively work to ensure the fairness of these systems.

Special consideration: The unique impact on vulnerable groups

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

4/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Organizations should also recognize that to build and maintain a digital society in which innovation is socially-beneficial and human dignity is protected, AI development and use have to be responsible and trustworthy.

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

4/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

This includes maintaining and providing on request sufficient information for that person to be able to understand how a decision was reached, and allowing them the opportunity to request human review and/or re-consideration of the decision.

5. Accountability

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

5/5

Protection of personal data and private life

In this document, we identify considerations for the application of key privacy principles to generative AI technologies.

About this document

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

4/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Be open and transparent about the collection, use and disclosure of personal information and the potential risks to individuals’ privacy.

4. Openness

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

1/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Canada’s federal, provincial, and territorial privacy commissioners will continue to explore this complex topic and may provide guidance or other resources as we learn more about the technology and its potential risks, including as formal investigations related to the technology are completed.

About this document

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

generative_ai privacy data_protection consent accountability