CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W2EDB49Unknown

Bill H.410 (Act 132)

Legislation UnknownNorthern America · USadopted

This Vermont legislative act establishes an artificial intelligence task force to study and make recommendations regarding the ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence. It outlines the composition, duties, and reporting requirements of the task force to help guide state policy on emerging technologies. The act directs the group to evaluate potential impacts, risks, and benefits of AI deployment within the state.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

General Assembly of the State of VermontLegislature · US
Lead issuer
Legal forceUnknown
Under whose authorityUnknown
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

State or provincial governmentLegislatorsPublic sector bodiesResearchers and academics

Legislators, public officials, and researchers interested in state-level AI governance and policy formation in Vermont.

Sectors
Public administration · state government administration and legislative studyCross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The establishment, membership configuration, administrative procedures, and study responsibilities of a specialized artificial intelligence task force.

What's missing

Specific regulatory mandates, substantive technical standards, definitions of prohibited AI uses, and direct enforcement mechanisms for commercial entities.

Key takeaways
  • An artificial intelligence task force is established for the state of Vermont.
  • The task force is mandated to study and evaluate the implications of artificial intelligence technologies.
  • Members are drawn from diverse stakeholder groups including government and technical experts.
  • A formal report detailing findings and recommendations must be submitted to the legislature.
Outline
· Section 1: Creation of Artificial Intelligence Task Force
· Section 2: Membership and Duties
· Section 3: Reporting and Recommendations
· Section 4: Effective Date
Issued31 May 2022
Length484 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopesubnational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

artificial_intelligence task_force legislation governance state_policy