Back to the database
Record STMT-W34B692Advisory

Earned Trust through AI System Assurance

Other State lawNorthern America · USin force

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) issued an AI Accountability Policy Request for Comment to gather public feedback on policies supporting AI audits, assessments, and certifications. The initiative aims to explore mechanisms that create earned trust in AI systems much like financial audits do for corporate financial statements. The request seeks input on necessary data access for audits, incentivizing credible assurance, and sector-specific approaches.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyGovernment · US
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

General publicCompaniesAI developers and providersAI deployers and usersResearchers and academics

Stakeholders, researchers, and organizations wishing to provide feedback on U.S. AI accountability policies.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers a request for public comment regarding AI accountability policies, data access for audits, regulatory incentives for assurance, and differing industry sector approaches.

What's missing

Specific regulatory mandates or binding rules for AI, as this is solely a request for comments.

Key takeaways
  • The NTIA seeks public input on policies supporting AI audits, assessments, and certifications.
  • The initiative aims to create earned trust in AI systems comparable to financial audits.
  • Input is requested on necessary data access, regulatory incentives, and sector-specific approaches.
  • Written comments must be submitted by June 12, 2023.
Issued11 April 2023
Length271 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

3/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Just as financial accountability required policy and governance to develop, so too will AI system accountability.

Paragraph 1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

1/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Comments submitted in response to the RFC will be made publicly available via https://www.regulations.gov/

Paragraph 4

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

3/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

NTIA’s “AI Accountability Policy Request for Comment” seeks feedback on what policies can support the development of AI audits, assessments, certifications and other mechanisms

Paragraph 1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

ai_accountability ai_auditing trustworthy_ai risk_assessment policy_consultation