Back to the database
Record STMT-W3EBF4CAdvisory

The Regulation, Governance and Ethics of Smart Robotic Systems in Manufacturing: UK and EU Insights

White paper Institutional policyEuropeadopted

This white paper outlines key regulatory, governance, and ethics considerations surrounding smart robotic systems in the manufacturing sector. Drawing on interdisciplinary research from the UKRI Made Smarter Innovation-Research Centre for Smart, Collaborative Industrial Robotics, it reviews existing frameworks for collaborative robots and provides recommendations for their reform. The primary focus is on the UK context, with comparative insights from the EU.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Loughborough UniversityAcademic · GB
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentRegulatorsCompaniesWorkers

This is intended for policymakers, regulators, employers, trade unions, and other key stakeholders in manufacturing.

Sectors
Manufacturing and industry · manufacturing

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers regulatory, governance, and ethical considerations for smart robotic systems and collaborative robots in the manufacturing sector, drawing on UK and EU insights.

What's missing

Not stated.

Key takeaways
  • The white paper outlines regulatory, governance, and ethics considerations for smart robotic systems in manufacturing.
  • It draws on research from the UKRI Made Smarter Innovation-Research Centre for Smart, Collaborative Industrial Robotics.
  • It evaluates existing frameworks for collaborative robots and smart robotic systems.
  • It provides recommendations for framework reform to support safer and more effective adoption in manufacturing.
  • It focuses primarily on the UK context while offering comparative insights from the EU.
IssuedMarch 2025
Length971 words
FormatNot recorded
Scoperegional

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

robotics manufacturing ethics regulation governance