CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W433C5DUnknown

NAIS - National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Committee

NAIS - 국가인공지능전략위원회

Strategy UnknownEastern Asia · KRin force

The National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Committee (NAIS) serves as a core governmental framework and body in South Korea aimed at advancing national artificial intelligence policies and strategies. The portal provides information regarding the committee's initiatives, organizational structure, and strategic directions for fostering AI innovation and governance.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

National Artificial Intelligence Strategy CommitteeGovernment (executive) · KR
Lead issuer
Legal forceUnknown
Under whose authorityUnknown
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentPublic sector bodiesAI developers and providersResearchers and academics

Researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders seeking information on South Korea's national AI strategy and governance structures.

Sectors
Telecommunications and digital services · artificial intelligencePublic administration

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the strategic objectives, organizational mandate, and governance framework of South Korea's National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Committee.

What's missing

Specific regulatory enforcement mechanisms, technical safety thresholds, and legal penalties are not detailed.

Key takeaways
  • The National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Committee acts as a central governance body for South Korea's AI development.
  • The initiative coordinates cross-sectoral AI policy and strategy across government and industry.
  • The platform outlines key priorities for advancing national AI capabilities and technological competitiveness.
Outline
not stated
IssuedNot recorded
Length220 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

artificial_intelligence national_strategy ai_governance innovation_policy