Generative Artificial Intelligence for Government Guidelines
These guidelines provide regulatory instructions for government employees in Saudi Arabia on the responsible use of generative artificial intelligence and the processing of government data. Issued by the Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA), the document outlines AI ethics principles, roles and responsibilities within government entities, potential benefits, and practical use cases with associated risks such as data leaks, misinformation, and deepfakes. It mandates that government employees limit GenAI usage strictly to public data and prohibit the entry of restricted or classified information.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Government employees, contractors, and data users in Saudi Arabia who utilize generative artificial intelligence tools in their official duties.
What the document contains
The document covers mandatory regulations, principles, and practical instructions for government employees using generative artificial intelligence, including data classification restrictions, risk assessment levels, operational use cases, and organizational responsibilities.
It does not provide specific technical source code requirements or details on commercial procurement contract templates.
- Government employees must only use generative artificial intelligence tools with data classified as public.
- Entering data classified as restricted or higher into GenAI tools is strictly prohibited.
- All GenAI outputs used in official capacities must be human-reviewed for accuracy, bias, and context.
- Government entities must ensure transparency by disclosing when content or interactions are generated by AI.
- The Data Management Office is responsible for approving GenAI tools and ensuring compliance with Saudi regulations.
· 1. DEFINITIONS · 2. THE SCOPE · 3. GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GUIDELINES · 4. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITHIN THE ENTITY · Appendix 1: Guidelines for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Government Entities · APPENDIX 2 - CHECKLIST FOR UTILIZING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Fairness
4/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
It is crucial to implement measures to identify groups affected by the system and to prevent or minimize biases, discrimination, or profiling that individuals or groups may encounter due to data or algorithms.
3.1 Fairness
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
4/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
It is essential to build and use GenAI tools according to a fair and ethical methodology grounded in human rights and fundamental cultural values.
3.6 Humanity
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
4/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
Government entities must also refrain from using generative artificial intelligence in critical decision-making processes that affect individuals or the vital interests of the Kingdom. All results should be human-reviewed to ensure the integrity of the GenAI output
2. The Scope
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
4/5Protection of personal data and private life
Employees in government entities must refrain from entering any data classified as restricted or higher (restricted, confidential, and top secret).
3.5 Privacy and Security
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
4/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
Notify beneficiaries when messages or content are created with generative artificial intelligence.
3.3 Transparency and Interpretability
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
4/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Below is a breakdown of the mandatory regulations governing the use of government data in generative artificial intelligence tools:
3. Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
screening score · 2026-10-23