Back to the database
Record STMT-W5E3658Advisory

Care Robots for the Elderly: Legal, Ethical Considerations and Regulatory Strategies

White paper State lawGlobalin force

This academic chapter identifies key ethical, legal, and regulatory issues arising from the use of care robots for the elderly. It highlights ethical concerns such as deception and trust, and discusses governance strategies for balancing innovation and user safety. Ultimately, the text provides guidance for lawmakers and policy developers establishing regulatory frameworks for assistive robotics.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsNational governmentRegulators

Lawmakers, policy developers, and researchers looking to understand the ethical and legal landscape of care robots for the elderly.

Sectors
Healthcare · elderly care

What the document contains

What's covered

The chapter addresses the ethical and legal implications of integrating care robots into elderly care, examining issues of trust, safety, and regulatory oversight to guide lawmakers and policy developers.

What's missing

Specific statutory text or binding legal rules are absent, as the document is an academic book chapter providing analysis rather than legislation or official policy.

Key takeaways
  • Ageing populations globally are driving the exploration of care robots in various settings.
  • The use of care robots raises special health, safety, ethical, and legal concerns.
  • Ethical aspects such as deception and trust are central to human-robot interactions in care.
  • Governance must balance innovation with appropriate regulatory oversight and developer support.
Issued17 February 2024
Length2,159 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

care_robots elderly_care robot_ethics robot_law regulatory_framework