Back to the database
Record STMT-W5EF376Voluntary

Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Overview of trustworthiness in artificial intelligence

Standard Institutional policyGlobalin force

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 is a technical report that surveys topics related to trustworthiness in artificial intelligence systems. It covers approaches for establishing trust through transparency, explainability, and controllability, as well as engineering pitfalls, threats, risks, and mitigation techniques. Additionally, it examines methods to assess and achieve availability, resiliency, reliability, accuracy, safety, security, and privacy in AI systems.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

International Organization for StandardizationStandards body
Lead issuer
International Electrotechnical CommissionStandards body
Co-issuer
Legal forceVoluntary
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

AI developers and providersCompaniesAI deployers and usersResearchers and academics

Developers, researchers, and organizations seeking an overview of trustworthiness concepts, risks, and mitigation techniques in artificial intelligence.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

Trustworthiness in AI systems, encompassing transparency, explainability, controllability, threat analysis, risk mitigation, and system characteristics like reliability, safety, security, and privacy.

What's missing

The specification of specific levels of trustworthiness for AI systems is out of scope.

Key takeaways
  • The document surveys topics related to trustworthiness in AI systems including transparency, explainability, and controllability.
  • It outlines engineering pitfalls, threats, and risks to AI systems alongside potential mitigation techniques.
  • It addresses approaches to assess and achieve availability, resiliency, reliability, accuracy, safety, security, and privacy.
  • The specification of concrete levels of trustworthiness for AI systems is explicitly excluded from its scope.
IssuedMay 2020
Length351 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

3/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

approaches to establish trust in AI systems through transparency, explainability, controllability, etc.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

3/5

Protection of personal data and private life

approaches to assess and achieve availability, resiliency, reliability, accuracy, safety, security and privacy of AI systems

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

3/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

approaches to establish trust in AI systems through transparency, explainability, controllability, etc.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

3/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

approaches to assess and achieve availability, resiliency, reliability, accuracy, safety, security and privacy of AI systems

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

trustworthy_ai artificial_intelligence standards risk_management explainability