Back to the database
Record STMT-W68DD46Aspirational

Granting Negative Rights to Humanoid Robots

Position paper Unknownunknown

This research article argues for granting negative rights, such as freedom from violence and discrimination, to humanoid robots. Taking a human-centred approach rather than relying on robot consciousness, the paper posits that protecting humanoid robots from immoral treatment is necessary to preserve human moral fibre and prevent societal moral degradation. Ultimately, the text advocates for a nuanced approach to robot moral status and rights.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

AIRCC Publishing CorporationAcademic
Publisher
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityUnknown
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsGeneral public

Researchers and scholars interested in the intersection of artificial intelligence ethics, robot rights, and moral philosophy.

Sectors
Research and science · academic research

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper addresses the theoretical justification for granting negative rights to humanoid robots to prevent human moral degradation resulting from immoral interactions with human-like machines.

What's missing

The document does not provide a formal governance framework, legal regulations, or enforcement mechanisms for robot rights.

Key takeaways
  • Humanoid robots should be granted negative rights like freedom from violence and discrimination.
  • This argument takes a human-centred approach, focusing on protecting human moral fibre rather than robot consciousness.
  • Treating humanoid robots immorally could damage collective societal moral standards.
  • A nuanced approach to robot rights avoids viewing the debate in strictly black-and-white terms.
Outline
· Abstract
· Introduction and Arguments for Granting Negative Rights to Humanoid Robots
Issued9 January 2023
Length264 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

1/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

freedom from discrimination.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

robot_rights moral_status humanoid_robots ethics negative_rights