Back to the database
Record STMT-W74707FVoluntary

Securing Agentic AI: An Addendum to the Guidelines and Companion Guide on Securing AI Systems 2025 (Draft for Public Consultation)

SECURING AGENTIC AI An Addendum to the Guidelines and Companion Guide on Securing A I Systems 2025 (DRAFT FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION)

Guidelines Institutional policySouth-eastern Asia · SGdraft

This document provides practical mitigation measures and security controls for agentic artificial intelligence systems. Published as a draft addendum for public consultation by the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore, it builds upon foundational AI security principles by addressing risks across the development lifecycle, system workflows, and agent capabilities.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Cyber Security Agency of SingaporeGovernment · SG
Lead issuer
AccentureIndustry
Contributor
Alibaba CloudIndustry
Contributor
Amaris AIIndustry
Contributor
CiscoIndustry
Contributor
Deloitte SingaporeIndustry
Contributor
DSO National LaboratoriesGovernment
Contributor
Fujitsu LimitedIndustry
Contributor
GoogleIndustry
Contributor
Government Technology Agency (GovTech)Government
Contributor
HP Inc.Industry
Contributor
Kaspersky Lab Singapore Pte LtdIndustry
Contributor
Microsoft CorporationIndustry · US
Contributor
Palo Alto NetworksIndustry
Contributor
PricewaterhouseCoopers Risk Services Pte LtdIndustry
Contributor
ResaroIndustry
Contributor
The American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore (AmChamSG)Industry
Contributor
Vulcan (vulcanlab.ai)Industry
Contributor
Legal forceVoluntary
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

RegulatorsCompaniesAI developers and providersAI deployers and usersResearchers and academics

System owners, decision-makers, AI practitioners, and cybersecurity professionals should read this to secure agentic AI deployments.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses cybersecurity threats, baseline components, architecture design, and capabilities of agentic AI systems. It outlines practical treatment measures and security controls across planning, development, deployment, operations, and maintenance.

What's missing

The guide does not cover AI safety topics such as fairness, transparency, or inclusion, nor does it address the misuse of AI for cyberattacks or scams like deepfakes.

Key takeaways
  • Agentic AI systems operate with reduced human oversight and introduce novel security considerations around system boundaries and rogue actions.
  • System owners should use a lifecycle approach combined with risk assessments and taint tracing across agentic workflows.
  • The document categorizes agentic risks across baseline components, system designs, and cognitive, interaction, and operational capabilities.
  • Practical case studies illustrate the deployment of safeguards in SaaS applications, client onboarding systems, and automated fraud detection.
  • Protocols such as the Model Context Protocol and Agent2Agent framework present specific interoperability and security considerations.
Outline
· Quick Reference Table
· 1. Introduction
· 2. How Agentic AI Works
· 3. Security Threats to Agentic AI Systems
· 4. Securing Agentic AI
· 5. Use Case Example
· Annex A Threats to Agentic AI Systems
· Annex B Model Context Protocol
· Annex C Agent 2 Agent Protocol
· References
Issued22 October 2025
Length23,994 words · 97 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

2/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Roles and access controls for agentic AI systems should be clearly defined to avoid unauthorised access or excessive privilege.

2.2.2. Roles & access control

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

1/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

It does not specifically address AI safety, or other common attendant considerations for AI such as fairness, transparency or inclusion

10. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

4/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Ensure adequate human oversight (human-in-the-loop) to verify model or agent output, when viable or appropriate.

4.4. ENSURE ADEQUATE HUMAN OVERSIGHT (HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP)

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

2/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Agents may inadvertently store sensitive user or organisational data from prior interactions, resulting in data privacy risks.

2.4 Identify, Track and Protect AI system assets

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

1/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

It does not specifically address AI safety, or other common attendant considerations for AI such as fairness, transparency or inclusion

10. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

1/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

These measures and controls are voluntary, and not all the measures and controls listed in this addendum will be applicable to all organisations

10. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

4/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Conduct a risk assessment, either based on best practices or your organisation’s existing Enterprise Risk Assessment/Management Framework.

4.1. TAKE A LIFECYCLE APPROACH, AND START WITH A RISK ASSESSMENT

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

agentic_ai cybersecurity risk_management artificial_intelligence security_controls