Back to the database
Record STMT-W79EDB5Soft law

A Systematic Review of the Definitions for Social Robots in Regulation and Its Implications for Researchers and Developers

Report International lawGlobaladopted

This systematic review examines how mobile service robots (MSRs) and social robots are defined in academic literature and explores their alignment with international standards, particularly ISO 13482:2014 and ISO/DIS 13482:2024. The authors analyze N = 51 articles to identify discrepancies between regulatory definitions and practical applications, noting that current standards often overlook vulnerable populations and non-physical risks. Ultimately, the paper proposes a refined MSR definition incorporating diverse embodiments, interaction modes, and user considerations to improve legal compliance and safety.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceSoft law
Under whose authorityInternational law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsRegulatorsAI developers and providersAI deployers and users

Researchers, developers, and regulators should read this paper to understand the definitional misalignments between robotics literature and safety standards.

Sectors
Research and science · robotics research and regulationHealthcare · care settings and medical devices

What the document contains

What's covered

This review covers the definitions, classifications, and technical characteristics of mobile service robots and social robots across academic literature and ISO safety standards like ISO 13482:2014, ISO/DIS 13482:2024, and ISO 8373:2021. It evaluates target users, interaction models, and embodiment types to assess regulatory alignment and identify compliance gaps.

What's missing

The text does not provide binding legal rules, specific national legislative enactments outside of general EU frameworks, or exhaustive commercial product testing data.

Key takeaways
  • There is a significant disconnect and definitional ambiguity between academic literature and international safety standards regarding mobile service and social robots.
  • ISO standards primarily emphasize physical hazards and mechanical safety while largely neglecting emotional, cognitive, and social interaction risks.
  • Vulnerable groups such as children, older adults, and pregnant women remain insufficiently protected and addressed within current robot safety frameworks.
  • Only a small percentage of reviewed studies explicitly align their robot definitions and classifications with ISO 13482 criteria.
  • A refined, integrative MSR definition is proposed to bridge the gap between technical standards, human-robot interaction research, and evidence-based regulation.
Outline
· Abstract
· 1 Introduction
· 2 Background Information: Defining Social Robots
· 3 Methods
· 4 Results
· 5 Discussion
· 6 Conclusion and Implications for Future Regulation
Issued3 August 2026
Length15,682 words · 21 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

1/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Given the many, sometimes contradictory, definitions of MSRs, researchers and developers face challenges around noncompliance and user safety.

1 Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

1/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

vulnerable groups, especially children, older adults, and pregnant women, remain insufficiently protected

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

1/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Cognitive and emotional risks in HRI, such as manipulation, decep - tion, or the illusion of intimacy, are largely unaddressed

2.2 What Does Not Constitute as an MSR

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

1/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

waiting for human input, being blocked by a human obstacle, and showing task progress to a user

2.3 Related Studies and Disciplines Covering the Definition of MSRs

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

3/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Our core objective is to examine the (mis)alignment between these academic and regulatory definitions and how classification directly shapes what MSRs are understood to be

1 Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

3/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

To support clearer hazard analysis, testing, and oversight, we systematically review MSR definitions

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

mobile_service_robot social_robots iso_13482 robotics_regulation systematic_review