Good Use and Governance of AI Bill
BUEN USO Y GOBERNANZA DE LA IA PROYECTO DE LEY
This document outlines Spain's proposed AI bill for trustworthy artificial intelligence, establishing a risk-based classification system, penalties for non-compliance, and measures for fundamental rights protection. It details prohibited AI practices such as social scoring and mass biometric surveillance, imposes obligations on high-risk and transparent AI systems, and assigns oversight roles to sector authorities and AESIA. Additionally, it highlights Spain's investments, infrastructure, and governance structures for safe AI development and public administration integration.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
This document is for citizens, companies, AI developers, and public administrators who need to understand Spain's regulatory framework and compliance requirements for artificial intelligence.
What the document contains
The document covers Spain's draft AI bill, detailing prohibited AI practices, risk categories, penalty structures, governance mechanisms involving AESIA and sector regulators, and deployment provisions within public administration.
The text does not state the exact enactment date or full legislative text, nor does it provide technical standard specifications or detailed implementation guidelines beyond structural summaries.
- The bill classifies AI systems into risk categories ranging from unacceptable (prohibited) and high risk to transparency obligations and minimum risk.
- Severe penalties of up to 35 million euros or 7% of annual business turnover are established for prohibited AI practices.
- High-risk systems require mandatory human supervision, digital prospectuses with clear instructions, and prior assessment.
- Sectoral authorities such as AEPD, Banco de España, and CNMV coordinate with AESIA to oversee compliance.
- Regulatory sandboxes are established to allow startups and companies to test AI systems safely before market release.
· Medidas Principales · Líneas de Actuación · La Pirámide de Riesgos y Casos Reales · Sistemas Prohibidos (Prácticas inaceptables) · Gobernanza Coordinada: La AESIA como Árbitro · IA Gobernanza Centralizada: La AESIA como Árbitro en la Administración · Sandboxes: El Laboratorio del Futuro
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
4/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
Responsabilidad para los proveedores de la IA: Sanciones por incumplimiento para los responsables de poner en el mercado
MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
4/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
Algoritmo de cribado que propone candidatos basándose en datos que pueden contener "sesgos históricos"
LA PIRÁMIDE DE RIESGOS Y CASOS REALES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
4/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
España impulsa una IA que proteja la dignidad y los derechos fundamentales de todos los ciudadanos europeos.
LIDERAZGO ÉTICO EN LA UE
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
4/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
Supervisión humana: Se exige supervisión humana para los sistemas de alto riesgo que puedan afectar a los derechos fundamentales.
MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
4/5Protection of personal data and private life
Prohibido en entornos laborales y educativos por vulnerar la intimidad del individuo.
LIDERAZGO ESPAÑA
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
4/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
Los sistemas de alto riesgo deberán contar con un prospecto digital con instrucciones de uso claras e información comprensible
MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
4/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Sanciones por incumplimiento para los responsables de poner en el mercado o en servicio un sistema prohibido de IA
MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
4/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
evaluaciones de impacto sobre sesgo discriminatorio y derechos fundamentales
IA GOBERNANZA CENTRALIZADA: LA AESIA COMO ÁRBITRO
screening score · 2026-10-23