Feasibility Study of Granting Legal Personality to Smart Robots Based on European Union Resolution (Electronic Person)
امکان سنجی اعطای شخصیت حقوقی به ربات های هوشمند با تکیه بر مصوبه اتحادیه اروپا (شخص الکترونیک)
This academic paper examines the feasibility of granting legal personality ("electronic person") to smart robots, based on a proposal and resolution by the European Union. Using a descriptive-analytical method, the author evaluates the current level of artificial intelligence autonomy, ethical challenges, and legal implications. The study concludes that granting legal personality is currently unnecessary and unjustified, suggesting instead that robots should be treated as products with strict liability along the supply chain.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Researchers, legal scholars, and policymakers interested in the legal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence and robot autonomy.
What the document contains
The article covers the definitions of artificial intelligence and robotics, the intersection of law and technology, ethical considerations such as the trolley problem, historical and philosophical perspectives on legal rights, and an evaluation of the European Union's proposal to grant electronic personality to smart robots.
The text does not provide binding statutory regulations or enforcement mechanisms, functioning instead as a scholarly feasibility study and legal critique.
- Granting legal personality to smart robots is currently not feasible or justified because artificial intelligence has not reached full autonomy and moral agency.
- The European Union's proposed "electronic person" concept aims to address third-party liability and compensation for damages caused by autonomous robots.
- Treating robots as products with strict joint and several liability across manufacturers, developers, and users is a more practical approach than creating electronic personhood.
- Smart robots lack true feelings, consciousness, and the ability to resolve complex ethical dilemmas like human beings.
· مقدمه (Introduction) · هوش مصنوعی و رباتیک (Artificial Intelligence and Robotics) · رابطه حقوق و تکنولوژی (Relationship Between Law and Technology) · اخلاق در هوش مصنوعی (Ethics in Artificial Intelligence) · حقوق ربات های هوشمند (Rights of Intelligent Robots) · امکان سنجی اعطای شخصیت حقوقی به ربات های هوشمند (Feasibility of Granting Legal Personality to Intelligent Robots) · جمع بندی و نتیجه گیری (Conclusion)
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
4/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
برای رفع خلأ مسئولیت و حمایت از زیان دیده، اعطای شخصیت حقوقی به ربات از سوی اتحادیه اروپا پیشنهاد شده است
مقدمه
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
2/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
اعطای حقوق بشری به ربات، حقوق بشر را نقض می کند و کرامت انسانی را از بین می برد
بخش ۵
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
3/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
چرا که ربات هوشمند به صورت مستقل و بدون نظارت انسانی تصمیم می گیرد
مقدمه
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
2/5Protection of personal data and private life
حفاظت از حقوق افراد انواع مختلف مانند سلامتی، مراقبت اجتماعی، حریم خصوصی و محیط زیست و ... را شامل می شود
بخش ۲
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
3/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
شفافیت تنها ویژگی مطلوب هوش مصنوعی نیست، همچنین مهم است که الگوریتم های هوش مصنوعی که عملکرد اجتماعی را برعهده دارند برای کسانی که آن را اداره می کنند قابل پیش بینی باشد
بخش ۳
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
4/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
اتحادیه اروپا برای جبران خسارت ناشی از اقدام های ربات های هوشمند طرح بیمه اجباری و صندوق جبران خسارت را پیشنهاد داده است
بخش ۵
screening score · 2026-10-23