CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W898C9CAspirational

Robots and Labor Regulation: A Cross-Country/Cross-Industry Analysis

Report International lawEuropeadoptedNot AI-specific

This working paper empirically investigates the relationship between labor regulations and the adoption of industrial robots across nineteen Western countries and eight non-service sectors between 2006 and 2016. The authors find that high levels of statutory employment protection are generally negatively associated with robot adoption due to increased adjustment costs. However, this correlation is positively mediated by sectoral capital intensity, suggesting firms also use robots as substitutes for labor to reduce workers' bargaining power and hold-up risks.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

University of TrentoAcademic · IT
Lead issuer
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityInternational law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsNational government

Researchers, economists, and policymakers interested in the institutional drivers of robot adoption and labor market dynamics.

Sectors
Labour and employment · manufacturing and industrial sectorsManufacturing and industry · industrial robots

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper examines the empirical relationship between labor regulations (specifically dismissal laws, fixed-term contracts, and industrial action rules) and the adoption of industrial robots across 19 countries and various non-service sectors between 2006 and 2016.

What's missing

The document does not provide policy recommendations, ethical frameworks for artificial intelligence, or legal compliance guidelines for companies deploying automation technologies.

Key takeaways
  • High levels of statutory employment protection are negatively associated with overall industrial robot adoption.
  • Labor regulations that increase adjustment costs make investment riskier and slow down overall automation.
  • Sectoral capital intensity positively mediates the relationship between labor regulation and robot adoption.
  • Firms in capital-intensive sectors utilize industrial robots as potential substitutes for workers to limit hold-up opportunities and reduce employee bargaining power.
  • Only labor regulation provisions that pose substantive constraints on dismissal show a statistically significant correlation with robot adoption.
Outline
· 1 Introduction
· 2 Labor Regulation and Determinants of Robot Adoption
· 3 Empirical Strategy
· 4 Empirical Results
· 5 Concluding remarks
Issued2021
Length9,494 words · 27 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scoperegional

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

Physical AI Governancecontext
robot_adoption labor_regulation employment_protection capital_intensity automation