Back to the database
Record STMT-W8E1A05Voluntary

AI Playbook for Small States

AI PLAYBOOK FOR SMALL STATES

Guidelines Institutional policyGlobaladopted

The AI Playbook for Small States serves as a collaborative guide compiled by Singapore and Rwanda on behalf of the Digital Forum of Small States (Digital FOSS). It shares best practices, case studies, and policy approaches for small nations to build human resource capacity, drive AI adoption in industry and government, foster trusted environments, and forge international partnerships. The document is designed as a living document to help resource-constrained small states navigate artificial intelligence opportunities and risks.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Infocomm Media Development AuthorityGovernment
Lead issuer
Ministry of ICT and InnovationGovernment (executive) · RW
Co-issuer
Legal forceVoluntary
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentRegulatorsPublic sector bodiesResearchers and academics

Policymakers and digital leaders in small states seeking guidance on implementing AI strategies and governance.

Sectors
Cross-sectorPublic administration · government services and policyResearch and science · AI research and development

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers strategies for small states to develop human resources, access compute and high-quality data, drive AI use in industry and government, establish trusted governance frameworks, and engage in international cooperation.

What's missing

It contains no binding legal regulations, mandatory compliance obligations, enforcement mechanisms, or formal technical definitions of artificial intelligence.

Key takeaways
  • Small states face unique constraints in compute, data, funding, and talent that require targeted collaborative strategies.
  • Building a solid human resource foundation through specialized AI education and broad-based training is critical for sustainable ecosystems.
  • Governments can catalyze wider industry adoption by prioritizing internal AI use cases and piloting public service applications.
  • Open-source testing tools and practical governance frameworks help smaller economies evaluate AI risks without prohibitive costs.
  • International networks and groupings like Digital FOSS amplify small states' voices to shape global AI governance norms.
Principles it states
Inclusive digital transformationSafe and trusted AI ecosystemsHuman-centric AI deploymentSustainable and resource-efficient AI development
Outline
· WHO WE ARE
· ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
· PREFACE
· CHAPTER 1: Laying Key Building Blocks
· CHAPTER 2: Driving AI Development and Use
· CHAPTER 3: Fostering a Trusted Environment
· CHAPTER 4: Forging Global Partnerships and Cooperation
· CONCLUSION
Issued22 September 2024
Length7,792 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Fairness

4/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

This can be achieved by offering localized content in multiple languages and crafting region-specific case studies that address distinct challenges and solutions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

1/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

AI’s potential transcends economic value, as it also has the power to uplift individuals, communities and societies.

PREFACE

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

4/5

Protection of personal data and private life

The “Artificial Intelligence and Information Privacy Principles” guidelines set out the legal requirements on how entities can collect, use and share personal information in relation to AI systems.

CHAPTER 3

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

4/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

The outcomes of the projects supported by ICAIN will be made publicly available and must be transparent in terms of both the AI models and training data used.

CHAPTER 1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

3/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Testing and evaluation of AI systems help surface gaps that need to be addressed. It also assures end-users that the risks identified have been mitigated and the safeguards are adequately in place.

CHAPTER 3

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

ai_governance small_states digital_inclusion capacity_building global_partnership