CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W90D3D8Advisory

Ethical implications of emotional and psychologic ties on human-robot interaction (HRI)-mediated learning

Position paper UnknownGlobalin force

This academic mini-review explores the ethical implications of emotional and psychological ties formed during human-robot interaction (HRI)-mediated learning. It highlights how children and users may develop deep affective dependencies on humanoid robots used for education and accompaniment. The author calls for an interdisciplinary research network combining pure sciences, applied sciences, and human sciences to establish ethical frameworks and examine the broader anthropological impacts of these technologies.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Juan de Castellanos University FoundationAcademic · CO
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityUnknown
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsGeneral publicAI developers and providersAI deployers and users

Researchers, scientists, and humanists interested in the ethical and anthropological impacts of artificial intelligence and robotics.

Sectors
Research and science · human-robot interaction researchEducation · HRI-mediated learning

What the document contains

What's covered

The text covers the ethical and psychological implications of human-robot interaction in educational and daily settings, focusing on emotional ties formed by children and the need for interdisciplinary research.

What's missing

The document does not provide specific technical standards, regulatory enforcement mechanisms, or concrete legal definitions.

Key takeaways
  • The integration of humanoid robots in learning environments creates novel social interactions and emotional bonds.
  • Children are particularly receptive to forming emotional and moral attachments to humanoid robots.
  • The rapid commercialization of robots risks outpacing ethical reflections on emotional dependencies and social isolation.
  • An interdisciplinary research framework combining philosophy, science, and the humanities is needed to study HRI implications.
  • Machine-mediated learning is not neutral and carries unprecedented implications for human subjectivity.
Outline
· Introduction
· Methodology
· Conclusion
Issued26 August 2019
Length1,576 words · 2 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

1/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

absence of emotional criteria that hinders fair, balanced, sustainable and respectful actions.

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

1/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

This life experience would conform social environments in which machines would be subordinated to human consciousness

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

2/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Instrumentalization and alienation are risks that must be detected in the advancement of robotics and its consequences for life on the planet.

Introduction

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

human_robot_interaction ethics education psychology post_humanities
Ethical implications of emotional and psychologic ties on human-robot interaction (HRI)-mediated learning · CEI AI Governance Database