Record STMT-WA111A6Advisory

Robots, AI, and Assisted Dying: Ethical and Philosophical Considerations

Position paper State lawGlobalin force

This academic chapter explores the ethical and philosophical implications of integrating artificial intelligence and robotics into the delivery or orchestration of medical assistance in dying, such as physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. It examines whether robotic systems could play a role in assisted dying, whether their use could make the process more ethical, and what broader insights this prospect offers for medical ethics and de-medicalization. Published in 2023 as part of an edited collection, the text serves as a scholarly inquiry rather than a binding legal or regulatory instrument.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry

Publisher

Legal forceAdvisory

Under whose authorityState law

Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsGeneral publicProfessional group

Researchers, ethicists, and healthcare professionals interested in the intersection of artificial intelligence, robotics, and medical bioethics.

Sectors

Healthcare · medical assistance in dying and healthcare roboticsResearch and science · bioethics and philosophy

What the document contains

What's covered

The text covers ethical, philosophical, and conceptual considerations regarding the potential use of artificial intelligence and robotics in medical assistance in dying, including physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.

What's missing

The document does not provide binding legal regulations, governance frameworks, technical safety standards, or actionable enforcement mechanisms for AI systems.

Key takeaways

The integration of robotics and AI into assisted dying raises novel ethical and philosophical questions.
Considering robotic assistance allows researchers to revisit debates concerning the de-medicalization of assisted dying.
The chapter investigates whether robotic systems can participate in the orchestration or delivery of medical assistance in dying.
The discussion intersects medical ethics, palliative care, and human-robot interaction.

Outline

· Abstract
· Introduction and Research Questions
· Philosophical and Ethical Considerations
· References

Issued4 March 2023

Length1,801 words

FormatNot recorded

Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

1/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Demands of dignity in robotic care: Recognizing vulnerability, agency, and subjectivity in robot-based

References

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

1/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Stevie has a privacy handset which is a live phone to aid confidential communication

Notes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

Physical AI Governancecontext

artificial_intelligence robotics euthanasia medical_ethics assisted_dying