Back to the database
Record STMT-WA3BB1EAspirational

National Robotics Strategy Theme 3: Trust, inclusion and responsible development and use

Theme 3: Trust, inclusion and responsible development and use

Strategy State lawOceania · AUadoptedNot AI-specific

This document outlines Australia's national strategy for ensuring robotics and automation technologies are developed and used safely, securely, ethically, and inclusively. It focuses on updating regulatory frameworks, understanding social impacts, engaging in international standards-setting, and improving the safety and cyber security of robotics. Case studies illustrate ethical guidelines for drone use on Jawoyn Country and assistive robotics for people with spinal cord injuries.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Department of Industry, Science and ResourcesGovernment
Lead issuer
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

General publicCompaniesAI developers and providersWorkers

This document is for policymakers, industry participants, researchers, and the Australian public interested in the responsible governance and future integration of robotics and automation technologies.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

This section of the National Robotics Strategy addresses how to foster trust, inclusion, and responsible development of robotics and automation in Australia. It covers social impacts on employment, data privacy, cyber security, regulatory frameworks, international standards, and case studies on ethical drone use and assistive technologies.

What's missing

Specific legal definitions, binding compliance enforcement mechanisms, and technical standards specifications are not provided in this document.

Key takeaways
  • Robotics and automation must be designed and adopted to be safe, secure, and inclusive by design for Australian workers and communities.
  • Collaboration between industry, government, communities, and workers is essential for responsible technology development.
  • Cyber security and data privacy measures are critical to protect industries and the wider community from risks associated with connected robotics.
  • Ethical frameworks must support First Nations data sovereignty and inclusive innovation, as demonstrated in drone usage on Jawoyn Country.
  • The strategy sets specific objectives, outcomes, and indicators of success to measure regulatory fitness, social impacts, standards adoption, and system security.
Outline
· Goal
· What we’ve heard
· Case study: Ethical protocols for drone use on Jawoyn Country
· Case study: Improving accessibility with robotics and automation
· Supporting government initiatives
· Objectives
· Outcomes
· Indicators of success
· Contact us
IssuedNot recorded
Length1,269 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

2/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

communities, industry, academia and government need to bring together a range of perspectives to identify potential biases and adverse consequences.

What we’ve heard

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

2/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

update governance frameworks to promote robotics and automation solutions that improve social wellbeing, inclusion and safety

What we’ve heard

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

1/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Research shows that robotics and automation often complement human labour, increasing employment and job satisfaction

What we’ve heard

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

2/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Managing cyber security, data privacy, collection, storage and use will be important to protect our industries and the wider community.

What we’ve heard

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

2/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Improved performance on measures of regulatory transparency and compliance.

Indicators of success

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

1/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Improved performance on measures of regulatory transparency and compliance.

Indicators of success

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

2/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Better understand and address the social impacts of robotics and automation in critical industries

Objectives

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

robotics automation trust inclusion cyber_security regulation