Back to the database
Record STMT-WBEF5D3Advisory

Are Robots to be Created in Our Own Image? Testing the Ethical Equivalence of Robots and Humans

Report UnknownGlobalin force

This academic paper investigates whether humans hold artificial systems to the same ethical standards as humans, an underlying assumption of artificial morality research. Through a series of survey-based studies assessing acceptable behavior for robots and human caregivers, the authors find little evidence to reject the assumption that people hold robots to the same ethical standards as humans. Consequently, the study concludes that ethical norms governing human-robot interaction can be modeled on existing moral norms regulating human-human interaction.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityUnknown
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsGeneral publicAI developers and providers

AI researchers, roboticists, and ethicists should read this to understand whether human-robot interaction can rely on standard human moral norms.

Sectors
Research and science · robotics and artificial intelligence researchCross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper covers empirical survey-based research testing the ethical equivalence of robots and humans in caregiving and interactive contexts. It evaluates how people judge robot versus human behavior to determine if artificial morality systems can rely on human ethical frameworks.

What's missing

The text does not provide binding regulatory frameworks, legal compliance mandates, or formal enforcement mechanisms for robot deployment.

Key takeaways
  • Research into artificial morality often assumes that humans hold artificial systems to the same ethical standards as humans.
  • A series of survey-based studies tested this hidden assumption regarding acceptable behavior for robots compared to human caregivers.
  • The studies found little evidence for rejecting the assumption that people hold artificial systems to the same ethical standards as humans.
  • The findings suggest that ethical norms for human-robot interaction can safely be modeled on existing human-human moral norms.
Outline
· Abstract
· Introduction
· Methods and Results of Surveys
· Discussion
· Declarations and References
Issued17 December 2022
Length1,757 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

social_robotics machine_ethics human_robot_interaction artificial_morality normative_ethics