Back to the database
Record STMT-WC20B85Advisory

Telesurgery’s Evolution During the Robotic Surgery Renaissance and a Systematic Review of its Ethical Considerations

Report ProfessionalNorthern America · USin forceNot AI-specific

This article outlines the current utilization of robotic telesurgery and discusses barriers to its adoption while performing a systematic review of relevant ethical considerations. It demonstrates how telesurgery can be developed to provide safe, equitable, and high-quality surgical care during the robotic surgery renaissance. The paper highlights the evolution of telesurgery between innovative and mainstream clinical practice.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SAGE PublishingIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityProfessional
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsProfessional group

Researchers and medical professionals interested in the ethical and practical evolution of robotic telesurgery.

Sectors
Healthcare · robotic-assisted surgery

What the document contains

What's covered

The utilization of robotic telesurgery, barriers to its adoption, and a systematic review of its ethical considerations.

What's missing

It does not provide legally binding governance regulations, policy directives, or a comprehensive code of conduct for hospital deployment.

Key takeaways
  • Telesurgery is evolving from innovative practice toward mainstream clinical utility.
  • The article performs a systematic review of the ethical concerns surrounding robotic telesurgery.
  • Developing safe, equitable, and high-quality telesurgery requires overcoming current technological and adoption barriers.
Issued11 April 2023
Length2,478 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

1/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

It illustrates how telesurgery can be developed to provide safe, equitable, and high quality surgical care.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

telesurgery robotic_surgery surgical_ethics systematic_review healthcare_innovation