Back to the database
Record STMT-WC59768Aspirational

Machine learning: the power and promise of computers that learn by example

Report Institutional policyNorthern Europe · GBadopted

This report by the Royal Society investigates the potential of machine learning over a 5-10 year horizon, examining its applications across various sectors and the barriers to realizing its potential. It emphasizes the need for an amenable data environment, strong skills pipelines, support for business innovation, and governance systems to address social and ethical challenges. The document provides recommendations on open data standards, education reforms, research investment, and public engagement to ensure the safe and rapid deployment of machine learning.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

The Royal SocietyAcademic
Lead issuer
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentGeneral publicRegulatorsCompaniesAI developers and providersAI deployers and usersResearchers and academics

Policymakers, researchers, business leaders, and educators seeking comprehensive guidance on the development, governance, and societal impacts of machine learning.

Sectors
Cross-sectorHealthcare · healthcare and medical diagnosisResearch and science · scientific research

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses the technological foundations of machine learning, emerging applications in public and private sectors, data environments and open standards, human capital and skills development, public attitudes and social implications, and a scientific research agenda to address technical and social challenges.

What's missing

Binding legislative enforcement mechanisms, specific procurement rules for government agencies, and detailed legal definitions of artificial intelligence.

Key takeaways
  • Machine learning allows computer systems to learn directly from examples, data, and experience rather than following pre-programmed rules.
  • Realizing the economic and social benefits of machine learning requires an amenable data environment based on open standards and broad data accessibility.
  • Action is needed across the education system to build data literacy, train informed users, and support advanced research talent.
  • The disruptive potential of machine learning brings societal challenges regarding privacy, consent, fairness, transparency, and the future of work.
  • Governance frameworks for machine learning should be handled in a sector-specific way rather than via an overarching framework for all uses.
Outline
Executive summary
Recommendations
Chapter one – Machine learning
Chapter two – Emerging applications of machine learning
Chapter three – Extracting value from data
Chapter four – Creating value from machine learning
Chapter five – Machine learning in society
Chapter six – A new wave of machine learning research
Annex / Glossary / Appendices
Issued1 April 2017
Length45,652 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

3/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Who should be accountable when machine learning goes wrong, whether or not there is a human in the loop, and what recourse should individuals or groups have in this context?

5.2 Social issues associated with machine learning applications

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

3/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Biases arising from social structures can be embedded in datasets at the point of collection, meaning that data can reflect these biases in society.

5.2 Social issues associated with machine learning applications

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

3/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

For some, this was an intense reaction to the possibility of machine learning changing their relationship with an activity of personal significance

5.1 Machine learning and the public

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

4/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Can we create machine learning systems whose workings, or outputs, can be understood or interrogated by human users, so that a human-friendly explanation of a result can be produced?

6.2 Interpretability and transparency

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

4/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

under clear and binding legal constraints to safeguard its use, and set out acceptable uses.

Recommendations - Creating a data environment to support machine learning

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

2/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

In designing their studies, researchers should consider future potential uses of their data, and build in the broadest consents

Recommendations - Creating a data environment to support machine learning

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

machine_learning artificial_intelligence data_governance skills_and_education research_and_development