CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-WC90B32Aspirational

Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagement

Report UnknownNorthern Europe · GBin force

This research paper examines the ethical and socio-technical questions surrounding the real-world deployment of wellbeing robots through community-centered workshops with under-represented groups. The authors analyze qualitative data to identify key themes regarding physical and emotional safety, cultural bias, data privacy, and the functional role of social robots. Ultimately, the paper provides a framework of four guiding questions that roboticists should address to align robot development with the public interest.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

University of CambridgeAcademic
Lead issuer
Aarhus UniversityAcademic · DK
Co-issuer
Harvard UniversityAcademic · US
Co-issuer
Association for the Advancement of Artificial IntelligenceAcademic
Publisher
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityUnknown
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

AI developers and providersGeneral publicAI deployers and usersResearchers and academics

Roboticists, AI researchers, and ethicists should read this to understand community perspectives and integrate ethical reflections into robot design and deployment.

Sectors
Research and science · human-robot interaction and robotics researchCross-sectorHealthcare · mental wellbeing coaching

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses ethical and socio-technical dimensions of real-world wellbeing robots through community engagement workshops. It covers safety concerns, cultural and design biases, data privacy, and the philosophical justification for using robots in mental health contexts.

What's missing

The text does not provide binding regulatory mandates, legislative enforcement mechanisms, or formal technical standards for commercial robot manufacturing.

Key takeaways
  • Real-world deployment of wellbeing robots raises critical ethical concerns regarding physical and psychological safety, particularly for vulnerable populations like children.
  • Robotic technologies often reflect Western-centric and engineering-driven biases, failing to adequately account for cultural diversity, intersectional identities, and accessibility.
  • Sensitive data collection by wellbeing robots introduces severe privacy risks, unclear ownership structures, and regulatory ambiguities, especially when deployed in environments like workplaces.
  • Anthropomorphic robot designs can create unrealistic expectations and emotional over-reliance, necessitating clear functional boundaries and improved user transparency.
Principles it states
Anticipatory ethics should be used to proactively identify potential risks, power imbalances, and unintended consequences early in the design and development process.Robot development should align with the public interest by incorporating diverse community perspectives and voices traditionally under-represented in robotics.
Outline
· Abstract
· 1 Introduction
· 2 Background and Related Work
· 3 Methodology
· 4 The Identified Ethical Questions
  - 4.1 Is It Safe and How Can We Know That?
  - 4.2 Who Is the Robot Built For and With?
  - 4.3 Who Owns the Robot and the Data?
  - 4.4 Why a Robot?
· 5 Discussion: Critical Look and Future Work
· 6 Conclusion
Issued2025
Length14,636 words · 16 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

2/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

3) Who owns the robot and the data?, and 4) Why a robot?

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

2/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

we argue that a robot should not be performing a therapeutic role in which trauma is discussed, without supervision from a human psychologist or therapist

4.4 Why a Robot?

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

Physical AI Governancecore
robotics ethics wellbeing community_engagement socio_technical_systems