Back to the database
Record STMT-WDB08EBVoluntary

Safe and Trustworthy Human-Robot Interaction

Report ProfessionalGlobaladopted

This academic book chapter examines the integration of safety and trustworthiness as primary design goals for human-assistive robots that directly interact with people. It focuses on verification and validation techniques, combining formal methods, simulation-based testing, and experimental evaluation to assess user trust. The text highlights the necessity of advanced verification methods to match the growing autonomy and sophisticated reasoning capabilities of robots operating in open environments.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceVoluntary
Under whose authorityProfessional
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsAI developers and providersAI deployers and users

Researchers and developers in robotics who need to understand safety assurance and verification techniques for human-robot interaction.

Sectors
Research and science · Robotics

What the document contains

What's covered

The chapter covers technical methodologies for verifying and validating robotic control code, simulation-based testing for human-robot interactions, and user trust evaluations.

What's missing

The text does not provide legal regulations, binding government policy directives, or specific enforcement mechanisms for robotic safety.

Key takeaways
  • Safety and trustworthiness must be treated as primary design goals for assistive robots interacting with humans.
  • Validating robot behavior requires a combination of formal methods, simulation-based testing, and experimental evaluation.
  • As robots gain advanced artificial intelligence and autonomy, verification methods must evolve to match their complexity.
  • User trust in robots is significantly influenced by robot performance, reliability, and error handling in practical settings.
Outline
Not stated
Issued8 September 2017
Length2,055 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

3/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

This chapter is focused on techniques that can be used to gain confidence in the safety of code used to control robots that directly interact with humans.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

robotics verification_and_validation safety trust artificial_intelligence