Could Robots Have Rights: An Intersection of Science Fiction and Philosophy
This academic book chapter examines the philosophical question of whether robots and AI systems can possess moral standing and rights, building upon the work of Anand Vaidya. The author utilizes examples from science fiction and Buddhist philosophy to explore whether sentience is a necessary condition for moral standing. Ultimately, the paper raises questions regarding personhood, rights for non-human entities, and the intersections of philosophy and science fiction.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
This chapter is for researchers, academics, and science fiction enthusiasts interested in the philosophical foundations of robot rights and AI ethics.
What the document contains
The text covers philosophical arguments surrounding robot and machine rights, the necessity of sentience for moral standing, and the integration of science fiction concepts with Eastern philosophies like Buddhism.
The document does not provide legal frameworks, regulatory enforcement mechanisms, or practical governance guidelines for AI deployment.
- The paper investigates whether machines can have moral standing even if sentience is not a necessary condition.
- Science fictional narratives from sources like Star Trek and Bladerunner are used to analyze philosophical arguments about personhood.
- Non-Western traditions such as Buddhism and Jainism offer valuable perspectives on suffering and rights in relation to non-human entities.
- The chapter serves as a tribute to late colleague Anand Vaidya and continues his work on the intersection of philosophy and science fiction.
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
0/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24
Fairness
0/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Dignity
3/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
Could robots have rights? Or, to quote the title of a paper by my late colleague Anand Vaidya, “Can machines have moral standing?”
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Oversight
0/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24
Transparency
0/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24
Enforcement
0/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24
Impact Assessment
0/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24