Back to the database
Record STMT-WDE6659Advisory

Industrielle Künstliche Intelligenz in Wissenschaft und Forschung

Report Institutional policyWestern Europe · CHadopted

This report, commissioned by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation and authored by the Swiss Academy of Engineering Sciences (SATW), examines the role of artificial intelligence in science and research. Based on expert interviews, it outlines current applications, challenges such as explainability and data availability, ongoing Swiss and European activities, and recommendations for action across higher education and federal policy.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Swiss Academy of Engineering SciencesAcademic
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentPublic sector bodiesAI developers and providersResearchers and academics

Policymakers, academic leaders, and researchers looking to understand the landscape and strategic needs of AI in Swiss science.

Sectors
Research and science · scientific research and higher educationPublic administration · federal and academic policy

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the applications, challenges, ongoing initiatives, and policy recommendations regarding the use of artificial intelligence in Swiss science and research.

What's missing

It lacks legally binding obligations, regulatory enforcement mechanisms, and specific technical safety mandates for commercial AI deployment outside of research.

Key takeaways
  • Artificial intelligence is transforming scientific research across disciplines by enabling pattern recognition, process modeling, and literature analysis.
  • Key challenges include data availability, lack of model explainability, susceptibility to bias, and intellectual property questions.
  • Switzerland possesses strong foundational research institutions and initiatives, but faces low venture capital and needs stronger coordination.
  • Experts recommend fostering decentralized networks rather than building a single centralized national AI center.
  • Clearer guidelines are needed regarding data ownership, open science, and text-and-data-mining licenses in academic publishing.
Outline
· Übersicht
· Anwendungen von KI in Wissenschaft und Forschung
· Herausforderungen
· Bestehende Aktivitäten
· Handlungsbedarf
IssuedOctober 2019
Length3,407 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Fairness

2/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Beim Einsatz von KI können Verzerrungen (Bias) auftreten, die nur schwer zu detektieren sind.

Herausforderungen

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Herausforderungen

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Handlungsbedarf

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Herausforderungen

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

artificial_intelligence research_and_development higher_education data_governance innovation_policy