SIENNA D5.6: Recommendations for the enhancement of the existing legal frameworks for genomics, human enhancement, and AI and robotics
This SIENNA project deliverable identifies potential changes needed in international, EU, and national legal and human rights frameworks to effectively implement ethical proposals for human genetics, human enhancement technologies, and AI and robotics. It provides actionable recommendations to improve enforcement, promote legislative uptake, and enhance effectiveness across these technology fields. The report outlines specific desired changes, responsible actors, implementation priorities, and challenges alongside mitigation strategies, while also discussing the interrelations between ethics and law.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Policymakers and researchers looking for guidance on enhancing legal frameworks for genomics, human enhancement, and AI and robotics.
What the document contains
The document addresses potential changes to existing legal and human rights frameworks to support the implementation of ethical proposals for human genetics, human enhancement technologies, and AI and robotics. It outlines concrete recommendations, responsible actors, priority levels, implementation challenges, and ethical-legal interrelations.
The provided text does not contain the detailed section-by-section outline or specific text of the recommendations.
- The report identifies necessary changes in international, EU, and national legal and human rights frameworks for emerging technologies.
- It covers three specific domains: human genetics and genomics, human enhancement technologies, and AI and robotics.
- Recommendations include actions to improve enforcement, uptake, and overall effectiveness of existing legislation.
- The text specifies responsible actors, implementation priorities, challenges, and potential ways to address them.
- It discusses the interrelations between ethics and law from a policymaker perspective.
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
0/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
screening score · 2026-10-24
Fairness
0/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Dignity
0/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Oversight
0/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
screening score · 2026-10-24
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
screening score · 2026-10-24
Transparency
0/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
screening score · 2026-10-24
Enforcement
3/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
It also includes recommendations to improve enforcement and promote the uptake and effectiveness of the existing legislation in these fields.
Description
screening score · 2026-10-24
Impact Assessment
0/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
screening score · 2026-10-24