CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-WF95B55Advisory

A Scale Development Study: Ethical Sensitivity Towards Artificial Intelligence and Robot Nurses

Report State lawWestern Asia · TRin force

This study develops and validates the Ethical Sensitivity Scale for Artificial Intelligence and Robot Nurses through a methodological approach. Conducted with 356 nursing students in Turkey, the resulting 17-item scale is organized into four sub-dimensions with confirmed validity and reliability. The findings provide a measurement tool to assess ethical awareness regarding AI and nursing robots in healthcare and educational settings.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

WileyIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsAI developers and providersAI deployers and usersProfessional group

Researchers, nursing educators, and healthcare professionals interested in assessing ethical awareness regarding AI and robotics in nursing.

Sectors
Healthcare · nursing and robot nursesResearch and science · scale development study

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the methodological development, factor analysis, validity, and reliability testing of a scale designed to measure ethical sensitivity toward artificial intelligence and robot nurses.

What's missing

The text does not provide regulatory frameworks, legal enforcement mechanisms, or binding governance policies regarding the use of AI in clinical practice.

Key takeaways
  • A new 17-item Ethical Sensitivity Scale for Artificial Intelligence and Robot Nurses was successfully developed and validated.
  • The scale comprises four sub-dimensions and accounts for 55.84% of the total variance.
  • Data were collected from 356 nursing students in Turkey between November and December 2022.
  • Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability testing demonstrated that the scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
Outline
· Abstract
· Background
· Methods
· Results
· Conclusion
· Conflicts of Interest
· Data Availability Statement
· References
Issued6 July 2025
Length2,299 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

ABSTRACT

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

ABSTRACT

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

ABSTRACT

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

ABSTRACT

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

ABSTRACT

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

ABSTRACT

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

ABSTRACT

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

ABSTRACT

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

Physical AI Governancecontext
ethical_sensitivity robot_nurses artificial_intelligence scale_development nursing_education
A Scale Development Study: Ethical Sensitivity Towards Artificial Intelligence and Robot Nurses · CEI AI Governance Database