CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-WFAED9BAdvisory

Should we fear artificial intelligence?

Report Institutional policyEuropean Unionin force

This European Parliamentary Research Service study examines the public debate surrounding artificial intelligence, addressing common fears about automation, technological unemployment, and existential risk. It evaluates both the potential benefits and risks of AI across various societal and economic sectors. The document aims to provide policymakers with a balanced overview to inform future regulatory approaches.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

European ParliamentLegislature
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

LegislatorsGeneral publicPublic sector bodiesResearchers and academics

European legislators and policymakers seeking an analytical overview of the risks and governance challenges associated with artificial intelligence.

Sectors
Cross-sectorResearch and science

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the socio-economic, ethical, and safety implications of artificial intelligence technologies, analyzing public fears and policy responses.

What's missing

It does not provide binding legislative mandates, enforcement mechanisms, or formal regulatory standards.

Key takeaways
  • Public discourse around artificial intelligence is frequently polarized between utopian technological optimism and dystopian fears of existential threat.
  • Economic impacts will likely involve significant labor market disruption and job displacement, requiring proactive policy responses.
  • Ethical concerns include algorithmic bias, accountability, and the loss of human oversight in critical decision-making processes.
  • Policymakers must foster innovation while establishing robust governance frameworks to protect fundamental rights and safety.
Issued2018
Length221 words
FormatNot recorded
Scoperegional

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

artificial_intelligence existential_risk automation economic_impact ethics