CEI AI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Row 62 · m062-ai-ethics-principles-and-mandatory-guardrails-proposalsSupporting

AI Ethics Principles and mandatory guardrails proposals

Asia-PacificRegulatory/legaldocument

Assessment outcome

total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 2690 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is explicitly about Australia's AI Ethics Principles and algorithmic systems governance.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source establishes ethical principles, rules, and guidance for responsible AI development and oversight.

G4 · Attributablepass

The issuing government department is explicitly named as the publisher of the document.

G5 · In forcepass

No notice of repeal, withdrawal, or supersession is present on the page; it remains current reference material.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: Principles or direction, no binding step. The text outlines voluntary principles and high-level goals without specific obligations.

Throughout their lifecycle, AI systems should benefit individuals, society and the environment.

Authority

1/2

Level 1: Reputable institution acting officially. Issued by the Australian government department.

Publisher Department of Industry, Science and Resources

Currency

2/2

computed: newest date 2026-07-01 (via meta), ~0.1y old; within the 36-month standards_frameworks window for perspective 'Regulatory/legal' → 2

Classification

Coverage topicAI ethics principles
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Trackgeneral
Granularitydocument