Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Responsible Technology

Business, Industry, Standards, and Operational GovernanceIndustrytopic page

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Issued by IBM and the Responsible Technology Board.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1: Reputable institution acting officially; published by IBM for its technology governance.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 823 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The page is primarily about AI systems, trustworthy AI pillars, and AI governance.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source details AI governance frameworks, standards, and responsible deployment rules.

G4 · Attributablepass

Issued by IBM and the Responsible Technology Board.

G5 · In forcepass

No indicators of supersession, withdrawal, or repeal are present on the page.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: Principles or direction; states what AI systems should provide without binding steps.

AI systems should be designed and developed to provide explanations and sufficient observability

Authority

1/2

Level 1: Reputable institution acting officially; published by IBM for its technology governance.

Responsible Technology | IBM Home Trust Responsible Technology IBM's Approach to Responsible Technology

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicResponsible AI governance and principles
PerspectiveIndustry
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitytopic page
Responsible Technology · CEI AI Governance Database