CEI AI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Row 166 · m166-rome-call-for-ai-ethicsSupporting

Rome Call for AI Ethics

Religious, Theological, Philosophical, and Cultural SourcesFaith/culturaldocument

Assessment outcome

total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 1)

Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 2021 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The entire document is about artificial intelligence and its ethical approach.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It addresses ethical principles, rules, and governance frameworks for artificial intelligence.

G4 · Attributablepass

The document lists named issuing individuals and organizations.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no evidence on the page that this version has been superseded, withdrawn, or repealed.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: Provides general ethical principles and direction (e.g., duty of explanation) without detailing specific binding technical steps.

In particular, it will be essential to consider some form of “duty of explanation”: we must think about making not only the decision-making criteria of AI-based algorithmic agents understandable, but also their purpose and objectives.

Authority

1/2

Level 1: Issued by reputable institutional leaders and organizations, but it is not a binding law, official state regulation, or peer-reviewed study.

The First Signatories Archbishop VINCENZO PAGLIA President of the Pontifical Academy for Life DR. BRAD SMITH President of Microsoft DR. JOHN KELLY III IBM Executive Vice President

Currency

1/2

computed: newest date 2022-03-23 (via pdf-meta), ~4.4y old; foundational window for perspective 'Faith/cultural' — age-agnostic source type, treated as still the authoritative reference → 1

Classification

Coverage topicAI ethics and human dignity
PerspectiveFaith/cultural
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Trackreligious cultural
Granularitydocument