CEI AI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Row 167 · m167-rome-call-hiroshima-interfaith-expansionSupporting

Rome Call Hiroshima interfaith expansion

Religious, Theological, Philosophical, and Cultural SourcesFaith/culturalhub homepage

Assessment outcome

total 3/4 (actionability 1 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6

Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 664 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is entirely dedicated to AI ethics and the Rome Call initiative.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It explicitly addresses ethical approaches, responsibility, and governance frameworks for artificial intelligence.

G4 · Attributablepass

The RenAIssance Foundation is explicitly named as the issuing body and organization behind the text.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this version has been superseded, repealed, or withdrawn.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: Provides principles and direction regarding ethical AI development without imposing binding steps.

developed to support an ethical approach to Artificial Intelligence and promote a sense of responsibility among organizations, governments, institutions and the private sector

Authority

2/2

Level 2: Official document issued by the Pontifical Academy for Life, a Vatican entity.

The Pontifical Academy for Life, Microsoft, IBM, FAO, the Italian Ministry of Innovation (part of the Italian Government), signed as first the “Call for an AI Ethics”

Currency

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicAI ethics and interfaith principles
PerspectiveFaith/cultural
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerhuman
Trackreligious cultural
Granularityhub homepage

Review notes

Suggested action

landing page, not a citable document — consider the institution registry, or replace with the document itself

Pipeline flags

currency_no_date;partial_scores:currency