Source assessmentSupporting
A Monotone Redundancy-Aware Decision-Burden Method for Explainable Human Oversight in Human–Robot Collaboration
explainable human oversight decision burdenAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Victoria University Research Article Keywords: trustworthy robotics, explainable autonomy, human–robot collaboration, human oversight, human-in-the-loop decision support, monotonicity, redundancy-aware aggregation, Artificial Age Score Posted Date: August 4th, 2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10506135/v1
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicexplainable human oversight decision burden
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded