Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems

AI accountability frameworkCivil-society/NGO

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 2 + authority 0); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability2/2
Authority0/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Such measures include, e.g., the development of an organizational AI governance strategy or the creation of codes of conduct

Authority

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Add Ellen Hohma 2 October 2023 - updated 1 year ago Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a transformative technology

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicAI accountability framework
PerspectiveCivil-society/NGO
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded