AI Companion Robot Data Sharing: Preferences of an Online Cohort and Policy Implications
Assessment outcome
total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6
Authorship & scope
Named academic authors are clearly listed as the creators of the paper.
Score 1. Published in an academic journal by university-affiliated researchers, representing a reputable institution acting officially.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 4837 words of full text extracted
The source explicitly focuses on AI companion robots and data collection.
It discusses policy implications, privacy, and data protection regarding AI systems.
Named academic authors are clearly listed as the creators of the paper.
There is no retraction or superseding notice on the page.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2Score 0. Describes research findings and analysis without naming specific binding obligations, controls, or duties to follow.
Authority
1/2Score 1. Published in an academic journal by university-affiliated researchers, representing a reputable institution acting officially.
Journal of Elder Policy Volume 2, Issue 3 pp. 19-54 Article AI Companion Robot Data Sharing: Preferences of an Online Cohort and Policy Implications
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)