Source assessmentContext only
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics: Theoretical and Legal Problems of Differentiation of the Conceptual Apparatus
Legal concepts of AI and roboticsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 2/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
ВЕСТНИК УДМУРТСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА 2020. Т. 30, вып. 5 ЭКОНОМИКА И ПРАВО УДК 34.023; 343.3 И.Р. Бегишев, З.И. Хисамова ИСКУССТВЕННЫЙ ИНТЕЛЛЕКТ И РОБОТОТЕХНИКА
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicLegal concepts of AI and robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded