Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Artificial Intelligence Between Criminal Accountability and the Difficulty of Attribution (Medical Robot as a Case Study)

Criminal accountability and medical robotsAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية Manuscript 1136

Currency

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicCriminal accountability and medical robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded
Artificial Intelligence Between Criminal Accountability and the Difficulty of Attribution (Medical Robot as a Case Study) · CEI AI Governance Database