Source assessmentCore
Notice to the Parties and the Profession: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Proceedings
court use of AI principlesRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
The Court will not use AI, and more specifically automated decision-making tools, in making its judgments and orders, without first engaging in public consultations.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Artificial Intelligence Interim Principles and Guidelines on the Court’s Use of Artificial Intelligence September 29, 2025
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topiccourt use of AI principles
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded