CEIAI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Back to “Reality”: A Review of Cheng Lin’s RoboHumanities: Imaginations, Narratives, and Ethics regarding Robots

robotic ethics and literatureAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Article type: Review

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicrobotic ethics and literature
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded