Source assessmentSupporting
Beyond Tools and Persons: Who Are They? Classifying Robots and AI Agents for Proportional Governance
CPST AI classification and governanceAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
We propose that reassessment triggers include: major software updates, sustained deployment beyond an ini- tial assessment period (e.g., 12 months), and user or third-party reports of significant changes in relational patterns.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
1University of Science and Technology Beijing; Beijing, China. 2Blekinge Institute of Technology; Karlskrona, Sweden.
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicCPST AI classification and governance
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded