Back to assessments
Source assessmentCore

Senate Bill No. 53 Chapter 138

frontier AI models and developersRegulatory/legaltopic page

Assessment outcome

total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6

Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Authored by Senator Wiener as a California Senate Bill.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Anchor 2: Binding law and legislation enacted by the State of California.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 7042 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is entirely about artificial intelligence models and large developers.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Addresses rules, oversight, and policy regarding frontier AI development and safety.

G4 · Attributablepass

Authored by Senator Wiener as a California Senate Bill.

G5 · In forcepass

No indication of repeal or supersession on the page; assumed in force.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

Anchor 2: Names specific legal obligations and duties developers must follow, such as writing and publishing a frontier AI framework.

A large frontier developer shall write, implement, comply with, and clearly and conspicuously publish on its internet website a frontier AI framework

Authority

2/2

Anchor 2: Binding law and legislation enacted by the State of California.

Senate Bill No. 53 CHAPTER 138 An act to add Chapter 25.1

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicfrontier AI models and developers
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
Granularitytopic page