Source assessmentCore
Draft Guidelines for the Adoption of AI in Public Administration
AI adoption in public administrationRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 6/6 (actionability 2 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total6/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Le presenti Linee Guida adottano i termini chiave: «DEVE», «DEVONO», «NON DEVE», «NON DEVONO», «DOVREBBE», «NON DOVREBBE», «PUÒ», «POSSONO» e «OPZIONALE»
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Il documento è stato redatto nell’ambito del Tavolo di concertazione del piano triennale per l’informatica nella pubblica amministrazione. Ai lavori hanno partecipato: - AgID - Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI adoption in public administration
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded