Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Categorizing Social Robots with Respect to Dimensions Relevant to Ethical, Social and Legal Implications

Social robots ethical legal implicationsAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The author of the chapter is explicitly named.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1: Published as an academic book chapter by a reputable publishing institution, but lacks explicit proof of peer review in the text.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 516 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

Social robots are the primary subject of the paper.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The text explicitly addresses ethical, legal, and social implications.

G4 · Attributablepass

The author of the chapter is explicitly named.

G5 · In forcepass

No supersession or retraction notice is present.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: Provides general direction and principles to consider during design without imposing binding steps or specific obligations.

We therefore encourage practitioners to consider these paradigmatic challenges when designing social robots to find creative design solutions.

Authority

1/2

Level 1: Published as an academic book chapter by a reputable publishing institution, but lacks explicit proof of peer review in the text.

In: Design, Development and Sensemaking of Human-Robot Interaction in Care Settings. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicSocial robots ethical legal implications
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
Granularitydocument