Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Clearview AI Inc v The Information Commissioner

facial recognition data protection jurisdictionRegulatory/legal

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 0 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

2/2

No rationale recorded.

First-tier Tribunal General Regulatory Chamber Information Rights

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicfacial recognition data protection jurisdiction
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded