Source assessmentSupporting
Clearview AI Inc v The Information Commissioner
facial recognition data protection jurisdictionRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 0 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
First-tier Tribunal General Regulatory Chamber Information Rights
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicfacial recognition data protection jurisdiction
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded