Source assessmentSupporting

Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content

Transparency of AI-generated contentRegulatory/legal

Assessment outcome

total 3/4 (actionability 2 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6

Total3/6

Actionability2/2

Authority1/2

Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Outputs of AI systems (audio, image, video, text) are marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

The Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content was drawn up by independent experts in a multi-stakeholder process facilitated by the AI Office.

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicTransparency of AI-generated content

PerspectiveRegulatory/legal

Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting

Layerboth

GranularityNot recorded