Source assessmentSupporting
Designing Social Robots with Ethical, User-Adaptive Explainability in the Era of Foundation Models
Ethical user-adaptive explainability in social roboticsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
We outline four recommendations for user-adapted explainability. Recommendation 1: Design modality- and user-aware explanation strategies.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Designing Social Robots with Ethical, User-Adaptive Explainability in the Era of Foundation Models Fethiye Irmak Doğan∗ University of Cambridge Cambridge, United Kingdom fid21@cam.ac.uk Alva Markelius∗ University of Cambridge Cambridge, United Kingdom ajkm4@cam.ac.uk Hatice Gunes University of Cambridge Cambridge, United Kingdom hg410@cam.ac.uk
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicEthical user-adaptive explainability in social robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded